Skip to main content

Full text of "Mechanical evaluation of some high speed handpieces"

See other formats


NATIONAL  BUREAU  OF  STANDARDS  REPORT 


MECHANICAL  EVALUATION  OF  SOME 
HIGH  SPEED  HANDPIECES 
by 

Duane  F,  Taylor 
Robert  Rs  Perkins 
John  W„  Kumpula 


U.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OF  COMMERCE 
NATIONAL  BUREAU  OF  STANDARDS 


6433 


Progress  Report 


on 


THE  NATIONAL  BUREAU  OF  STANDARDS 


Functions  find  Activities 

The  functions  of  the  National  Bureau  of  Standards  are  set  forth  in  the  Act  of  Congress,  March 
3,  1901,  as  amended  b)  Congress  in  Public  Law  619,  19S0.  These  include  the  development  and 
maintenance  of  the  national  standards  of  measurement  and  the  provision  of  means  and  methods 
for  making  measurements  consistent  with  these  standards;  the  determination  of  physical  constants 
and  properties  of  materials;  the  development  of  methods  and  instruments  for  testing  materials, 
devices,  and  structures;  advisory  services  to  Government  Agencies  on  scientific  and  technical 
problems;  invention  and  development  of  devices  to  serve  special  needs  of  the  Government;  and  the 
development  of  standard  practices,  codes,  and  specifications.  The  work  includes  basic  and  applied 
research,  development,  engineering,  instrumentation,  testing,  evaluation,  calibration  services,  and 
various  consultation  and  information  services.  A major  portion  of  the  Bureau's  work  is  performed 
for  other  Government  Agencies,  particularly  the  Department  of  Defense  and  the  Atomic  Energy 
Commission.  The  scope  'of  activities  is  suggested  by  the  listing  of  divisions  and  sections  on  the 
inside  of  the  back  cover. 

Reports  and  Publications 

The  results  of  the  Bureau’s  work  take  the  form  of  either  actual  equipment  and  devices  or 
published  papers  and  reports.  Reports  are  issued  to  the  sponsoring  agency  of  a particular  project 
or  program.  Published  papers  appear  cither  in  the  Bureau's  own  series  of  publications  or  in  the 
journals  of  professional  and  scientific  societies.  The  Bureau  itself  publishes  three  monthly  peri- 
odicals, available  from  the  Government  Printing  Office:  The  Journal  of  Research,  which  presents 
complete  papers  reporting  technical  investigations;  the  Technical  News  Bulletin,  which  presents 
summary  and  preliminary  reports  on  work  in  progress;  and  Basic  Radio  Propagation  Predictions, 
which  provides  data  for  determining  the  best  frequencies  to  use  for  radio  communications  throughout 
the  world.  There  are  also  five  series  of  nonperiodical  publications:  The  Applied  Mathematics 
Series,  Circulars,  Handbooks,  Building  Materials  and  Structures  Reports,  and  Miscellaneous 
Publications. 

Information  on  the  Bureau’s  publications  can  be  found  in  NBS  Circidar  460,  Publications  of 
the  National  Bureau  of  Standards  ($1.25)  and  its  Supplement  ($0.75),  available  from  the  Superin- 
tendent of  Documents,  Government  Printing  Office,  Washington  25,  D.  C. 

Inquiries  regarding  the  Bureau’s  reports  should  be  addressed  to  the  Office  of  Technical  Informa- 
tion, National  Bureau  of  Standards.  Washington  25,  D.  C. 


NATIONAL  BUREAU  OF  STANDARDS  REPORT 


NBS  PROJECT  MBS  REPORT 

0708-20-3824  June  12 y 1959  6433 

Progress  Report 
on 

MECHANICAL  EVALUATION  OF  SOME 
HIGH  SPEED  HANDPIECES 

by 

Duane  F,  Taylor* 

Robert  R,  Perkins** 

John  W„  Kumpula ' 

* Metallurgists  Dental  Research  Sections  National  Bureau 
of  Standards, 

**  Guest  Workers  U,  S,  Navy,  Dental  Research  Sections 
National  Bureau  of  Standards, 

' Laboratory  Mechanics  Dental  Research  Sections  National 
Bureau  of  Standards, 

This  work  is  a part  of  the  dental  research  program  conduc- 
ted at  the  National  Bureau  of  Standards  in  cooperation 
with  the  Council  on  Dental  Research  of  the  American  Dental 
Associations  the  Army  Dental  CorpSs  the  Dental  Sciences 
Division  of  the  School  of  Aviation  Medicines  USAFs  the 
Navy  Dental  Corps.,  and  the  Veterans  Administration, 


IMPORTANT  NOTICE 


NATIONAL  BUREAU  OF  STAf 
intended  for  use  within  the  G( 
to  additional  evaluation  and  re\, 
listing  of  this  Report,  either  in 
the  Office  of  the  Director,  Natii 
however,  by  the  Government  a{ 
to  reproduce  additional  copies 


Approved  for  public  release  by  the 
director  of  the  National  Institute  of 
Standards  and  Technology  (NIST) 
on  October  9,  2015 


igress  accounting  documents 
ally  published  it  is  subjected 
production,  or  open-literature 
in  is  obtained  in  writing  from 
uch  permission  is  not  needed, 
epared  If  that  agency  wishes 


U.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OF  COMMERCE 
NATIONAL  BUREAU  OF  STANDARDS 


• ; 

ft-  ■ 

ft. 


: ft  ft  ft,  ■,  J»  ft ¥ “tjTft  y 


.■Vft'  ■■ 


J . V ft 


•;  . ■ * ft 


h ft  : 


■? 


■ft.  . - . > 


",  c ft  . - ft?  ■ / -ft-'  S % 

ft'  - .-.-ft  ' . V -ft.  ft  ft.  : ,i 

• ' •••  •.  ft  •.  ' ... 


'ii 


ft  ft 

■ ft  - ,-  ft  ft  - 

- '.ft  ’ : . - ' : -ft  ' ft  >ft  : , •;•-  ft  ■ .;  ••  . 

' ’ ft  . '-  i’.ft  : ■'  . .ft- 

.ft  ' ; :ft . -A  ' ■, 

■ ■ ■ . . ft,  A1;;  ' 


■ ‘f  ■■ 


ft,  - s j '--■■■  ■ 4Q  ; I 

. ft  ft  ■ . ft  :•  • M A—  ft  ft 


MECHANICAL  EVALUATION  OF  SOME 


HIGH  SPEED  HANDPIECES 


Abstract 


The  power  transmission  characteristics 
of  a series  of  dental  air  turbine  handpieces  were 
studied . The  torque  produced  as  a function  of 
speed  was  determined  for  each  handpiece  tested. 

The  effects  of  air  pressure.,  instrument  size,  and 
instrument  balance  upon  the  speed  and  power  were 
investigated.  Increased  pressure  was  found  to  be 
more  effective  in  increasing  power  than  in  increas- 
ing speed.  The  size  of  the  instrument  was  found  to 
have  negligible  effect  upon  the  power  output  in  com- 
parison to  the  effect  of  dynamic  balance. 


I o INTRODUCTION 


The  introduction  in  the  last  few  years  of  a wide 
variety  of  high-speed  dental  handpieces  and  instruments 
has  emphasized  the  need  for  some  method  of  evaluating  dental 
cutting  procedures » The  dental  literature  has  been  filled 
with  papers  related  to  the  use  of  high  speeds,  and  a 
complete  bibliography  on  the  subject  would  run  to  several 
hundred  items  for  the  last  five  years  alon@0  Only  a 
very  few  of  these  papers,  however,  have  been  concerned 
with  the  mechanism  of  cutting  or  the  instruments 
themselves  /”l-3__7o  The  majority  have  been  directed 
toward  techniques  for  their  clinical  use* 

The  Dental  Research  Section  of  the  National  Bureau 
of  Standards  has  for  several  years  conducted  a program 
of  research  into  various  non-elinical  aspects  of  the 
dental  cutting  problem  One  portion  of  this 

program  has  been  the  investigation  of  the  mechanical 
operating  characteristics  of  dental  handpieces „ This 
paper  presents  our  findings  and  conclusions  in  regard 
to  one  group  of  these  handpieces,  the  air  turbines „ 

The  program  as  a whole  is  directed  toward  providing 
a more  fundamental  understanding  of  the  cutting  process 
with  particular  emphasis  upon  the  energy  considerations 
involvedc  A wide  variety  of  handpieces  was  studied  to 


/ 


2 


provide  basic  information  in  regard  to  the  conditions 
that  are  encountered  clinically.  These  handpieces  included 
belt-driven  designs  having  maximum  speeds  from  6,000  to 
150,000  rpm,  and  water  turbines,  as  well  as  the  air  tur- 
bines discussed  here.  It  is  hoped  that  this  study  not 
only  will  provide  a basis  for  quantitative  measurement 
of  the  characteristics  of  different  types  of  handpieces 
but  also  will  lead  to  a better  understanding  of  the  cutting 
process  itself. 

The  method  employed  involves  measurement  of  the 
energy  transferred  at  several  places  within  the  cutting 
equipment,  most  particularly  the  energy  transfer  from 
the  handpiece  to  the  instrument  and  from  the  instrument 
to  the  surface  being  cut.  This  permits  the  comparison 
of  the  useful  work  obtained  (cutting)  to  the  losses  (heat, 
noise  and  vibration)  and  allows  an  evaluation  of  the 
relative  efficiency  of  various  handpiece-instrument  com- 
binations. A detailed  description  of  the  equipment  de- 
veloped and  methods  employed  in  this  study  appears  else- 
where /TO/7,  and  only  a short  discussion  will  be  given  here, 

II.  EXPERIMENTAL  PROCEDURE 

The  air  turbines  tested  are  listed  in  Table  1.  As 
indicated  there,  the  number  of  samples  tested  ranged  from 


- 3 - 


one  to  four.  The  Midwest  handpiece  tested  was  an 
experimental  design  employing  latch-type  burs  rather  than 
the  friction-grip  design  presently  available.  The  other 
handpieces  were  all  standard  commercial  models. 

The  operating  characteristics  of  the  handpieces 
were  studied  by  determining  the  torque  delivered 
to  the  instrument  shaft  by  the  handpiece  at  various  speeds. 
An  overall  view  of  the  equipment  used  for  this  purpose 
is  shown  in  Figure  1,  while  a close-up  view  with  a hand- 
piece  mounted  for  testing  appears  in  Figure  2. 

This  apparatus  was  designed  to  produce  a braking 
effect  upon  the  handpiece  by  interaction  between  a 
synchronous  magnetic  field  and  a permanent  magnet 
ferrite  cylinder  mounted  in  the  handpiece.  The  braking 
.field  was  brought  into  synchronization  with  the  handpiece 
and  the  field  strength  increased  until  the  handpiece 
speed  was  controlled  by  the  field  frequency.  The  hand- 
piece  speed  was  then  varied  by  changing  the  frequency 
while  the  torque  produced  at  various  speeds  was  observed. 

Calibration  and  reading  errors  cause  a relative 
uncertainty  of  about  five  percent  between  the  individual 
observations  on  a single  run  for  both  speed  and  torque. 
Absolute  values  of  torque  are  known  to  the  same  accuracy 


- 4 - 


but  drift  in  calibration  of  the  frequency  measuring  system 
induces  a maximum  additional  uncertainty  of  5$  in  the 
absolute  speed  determinations. 

Results  and  Discussion 

A typical  torque-speed  relationship  found  by  this 
technique  is  shown  in  Figure  3°  The  shape  of  this  curve 
is  typical  of  all  of  the  turbines  tested.  It  has  been 
generally  observed  clinically  that  the  torque  produced  by 
the  air  turbines  is  much  smaller  than  that  produced  by 
conventional  belt-driven  handpieces.  For  example,  the 
maximum  torque  produced  in  this  run,  about  10  gram- 
centimeters,  is  attained  at  minimum  speed  and  may  be 
compared  with  the  250-300  gram-centimeters  maximum  torques 
achieved  by  typical  ball  bearing  belt-driven  handpieces 
as  shown  in  Figure  4. 

The  results  obtained,  particularly  in  some  of  the 
early  runs,  were  not  always  as  regular  as  those  of  Figure  3* 
Data  of  the  type  shown  in  Figure  5 were  often  obtained  and 
in  some  cases  the  curves  were  as  irregular  as  that  shown 
in  Figure  6.  In  this  case,  at  the  air  pressure  used, 

(30  psi),  the  handpiece  would  reach  a maximum  speed  of 
only  110,000  rpm.  When  that  speed  was  approached  the 
handpiece  became  increasingly  noisy  and  the  cylinder  ran 


- 5 - 

very  eccentrically.  Gradually  increasing  the  air  pressure 
made  little  difference  in  the  speed  until  near  50  psi, 
when  the  speed  suddenly  increased  to  400,000  rpm.  Re- 
ducing the  pressure  to  30  psi  produced  a free  running 
speed  of  360,000  rpm.  From  that  point  the  torque- 
speed  curve  could  be  traced  to  300,000  rpm  where  the 
torque  dropped  toward  zero.  It  was  impossible  to  follow 
the  curve  continuously  through  this  range  and  the  middle 
section  (between  300,000  and  100,000  rpm)  was  derived  only 
by  pressure  cycling.  When  this  was  done,  however,  it 
was  possible  to  follow  this  portion  of  the  curve  satis- 
factorily at  30  psi  pressure. 

This  behavior  was  attributed  to  a resonance  effect. 
The  regular  spacing  of  the  speeds  at  which  reduced  torques 
appear,  support  this  conclusion.  Major  drops  occurred 
near  100,000  and  300,000  rpm  and  a smaller  drop  at 
200,000  rpm.  Although  the  magnet  cylinders  and  the 
handpiece  rotors  were  themselves  well  balanced,  it  was 
conceivable  that,  when  the  magnets  were  inserted  in  the 
handpiece,  errors  of  alignment  or  centering  might  make 
the  rotor-cylinder  combination  dynamically  unbalanced. 

As  a result,  an  attempt  was  made  to  grind  the  magnet 
cylinder  into  dynamic  balance  while  driving  them  with  the 
handpiece. 


- 6 - 


Figure  7 shows  three  of  the  magnet  cylinders  used. 

The  one  on  the  left  has  been  ground  and  balanced  relative 
to  its  shaft,  while  the  others  have  subsequently  been 
balanced  in  a handpiece.  Of  the  three,  the  one  on  the 
right  ran  the  fastest  in  spite  of  its  rough  appearance. 
Improvement,  when  it  occurred,  was  often  dramatic  though 
not  readily  predictable.  Table  2 shows  the  results 
of  a series  of  successive  grinding  passes  on  three 
cylinders  being  balanced  for  the  same  handpiece. 

The  particular  rotor  with  which  these  data  were 
obtained  was  very  sensitive  to  defects  of  balancing, 
although  a previous  rotor  in  the  same  handpiece  had 
shown  a much  less  marked  effect. 

Somewhat  similar,  though  less  extreme  behavior  was 
observed  with  burs.  When  several  burs  of  the  same  size  were 
tested,  they  were  commonly  observed  to  run  at  different 
maximum  speeds.  Alsq,  reducing  the  pressure  to  the 
handpiece  to  levels  of  5 to  10  psi  at  times  produced 
results  with  burs  which  closely  resembled  those  with 
unbalanced  cylinders.  In  the  case  of  the  burs,  however, 
increase  of  pressure  back  to  the  normal  operating  range  or 
removing  and  repositioning  the  bur  in  the  handpiece  were 
sufficient  to  let  the  handpiece  escape  the  low  speed 


I 


- 7 - 

resonance  and  achieve  normal  free-running  speeds. 

Apparently  the  same  type  of  effects  occur  with  the 
cylinders  and  with  hurs.  However,  because  of  the 
relatively  small  mass  of  the  burs  the  effect  becomes 
apparent  only  under  those  circumstances  where  the  torque 
of  the  handpiece  is  already  marginal,  near  maximum  speed 
or  at  very  low  pressures.  Diamond  instruments  should  be 
expected  to  produce  similar  results  intermediate  to 
these  two  cases. 

Table  3 illustrates  the  importance  of  this  factor  in 
determining  handpiece  speeds.  It  compares  the  maximum 
speeds  attained  with  three  magnet  cylinders  and  four  burs 
at  a series  of  pressures.  The  cylinders  were  all  balanced 
by  grinding  in  the  handpiece  used  for  the  tests,  a Weber 
AT  200.  Note  that  of  the  three  cylinders,  .No.  1 which 
was  the  slowest  running  of  the  three  still  shows  signs 
of  resonance  problems  and  is  apparently  not  fully  balanced. 
It  shows  a one-third  increase  in  speed  between  20  and 
30  psi  from  180,000  to  240,000  rpm,  (both  multiples  of 
60,000),  and  not  until  the  pressure  was  increased  to 
60  psi  was  any  further  increase  in  speed  obtained.  The 
other  cylinders  and  the  burs  showed  a continual  increase 
in  speed  with  pressure. 


I 


'•  ; / 


' •-  ■ - 


■ , i -:v 


...~r  ■ 

- . ■ 

- v - 

. • •.  f-  - 


' 


<■:  * 


.,-v 


8 


Probably  the  most  significant  point  relative  to  this 
table,  however,  is  that,  in  spite  of  their  large  size 
(approx.1  .240  x .400  inch)  and  the  irregular  surface 
produced  in  the  balancing  operation,  cylinders  2 and  3 ran 
as  fast  or  faster  than  any  of  the  burs.  This  indicates 
that  size  alone  is  no  detriment  for  high  speed  operation 
and  that  air  drag  must  play  a very  minor  role  in  controlling 
speed.  It  also  appears  that  an  eccentric  bur  or  worn 
chuck  that  unbalances  the  rotor  can  result  in  considerable 
slowing  of  the  handpiece  and  reduced  performance. 

Typical  torque-speed  cpr>eg  for  the  various  handpieces 
tested  with  resonance  effects  eliminated  are  shown  in 
Figure  8.  All  curves  are  for  30  psi  air  pressure  which 
is  the  approximate  maximum  pressure  allowed  by  the 
regulators  in  the  S.  S.  White  and  Ritter  handpieces  tested. 

Of  the  six  curves  shown,  numbers  1,  2,  and  6 are 
for  handpieces  using  latch-type  contra-angle  burs  while 
the  other  three  handpieces  use  friction-grip  burs.  The  use 
of  the  larger  shank,  latch-type  bur  results  in  a larger 
overall  head  size  for  the  handpiece  and  appears  to 
require  a greater  air  supply.  Of  the  three  latch- type 
handpieces  tested,  only  one,  the  Weber  AT  200  is  marketed 
at  the  present  time.  It  has  replaced  the  Weber  model  700. 


_ 9 - 


The  Midwest  handpiece  studied  has  been  replaced  by  a 
friction-grip  handpiece  which  was  not  tested. 

In  those  cases  where  several  samples  of  a single 
handpiece  design  were  tested,  considerable  differences 
in  performance  were  noted.  In  addition,  smaller  changes 
occurred  from  day  to  day  and  run  to  run  with  a single 
handpiece.  These  variations  together  amount  to  as  much  as 
± 15$  from  the  mean  and  appear  to  be  due  mainly  to  such 
causes  as  irregular  lubrication  and  bearing  wear. 

While  the  torque-speed  curve  provides  the  basic 
information  in  regard  to  the  energy  transferred  from  the 
handpiece  to  the  bur,  in  many  cases,  it  is  more  informative 
as  well  as  more  convenient  to  work  with  power-speed  data. 
Since  the  power  of  a rotating  device  is  equal  to  the 
product  of  the  speed  and  torque,  the  power-speed  curve 
is  readily  derived  from  the  torque-speed  measurements. 

The  power  curves  corresponding  to  the  runs  of  Figure  8 

are  shown  in  Figure  9°  For  comparison  the  belt-driven 

% 

handpiece  of  Figure  4 develops  a maximum  power  of  25.9 
watts  at  19  9 000  rprru 

The  effect  of  variations  in  pressure  upon  the  per- 
formance of  one  air  turbine  handpiece  is  shown  in  Figures 
10  and  11.  The  values  given  are  for  the  Weber  AT  200, 


10  - 


which  is  shown  here  because  of  the  range  of  pressures 
usable  with  this  handpiece.  A wide  pressure  range  is 
definitely  advantageous  for  laboratory  investigation  since 
it  permits  the  study  of  a variety  of  speeds  and  powers 
with  a single  handpiece. 

The  clinical  necessity  for  very  high  pressures  is 
doubtful  and  some  makes  of  handpieces  have  regulators 
which  permit  a maximum  pressure  of  30  psi. 

The  curves  of  Figures  10  and  11  show  certain 
characteristics  common  to  all  of  the  air  turbines  tested. 
The  effect  of  increasing  air  pressure  is  much  greater 
upon  the  torque  than  upon  the  speed.  As  seen  in  Figure 
10,  doubling  the  air  pressure  will  approximately  double 
the  maximum  torque  developed  but  will  increase  the 
maximum  speed  only  1 6$.  The  influence  of  design  appears 
to  be  much  more  important  than  air  pressure  in  determining 
maximum  handpiece  speed.  However,  the  pressure  used  may 
make  a considerable  difference  in  the  speed  reached 
during  cutting.  Figure  10  indicates  that  if  the  handpiece 
is  required  to  supply  five  gram-centimeters  of  torque  to 
the  instrument  during  cutting,  (a  high  value  for  this 
speed  range),  the  handpiece  will  run  270,000  rpm  at  60  psi, 
240,000  rpm  at  50  psi,  205,000  rpm  at  40  psi,  135,000  rpm 


7 


11 


at  30  psl,  and  will  stall  completely  at  20  psi. 

Figure  11  shows  that  the  maximum  power  available 
increases  rapidly  with  increased  pressure.  The  speed 
at  which  the  maximum  power  occurs  is  also  seen  to 
increase  with  pressure. 

Unfortunately,  from  the  clinical  point  of  view, 
information  is  not  yet  available  as  to  how  much  power 
is  needed  or  desirable  for  operative  use.  It  is  now 
possible  to  make  a start  in  that  direction  by  making 
cutting  tests  using  handpieces  whose  operating  charac- 
teristics are  known.  Provided  with  the  data  of  Figure  11, 
it  is  possible,  for  example,  to  make  a series  of  cuts 
at  a constant  speed  with  varying  powers  (shown  by  the 
dots  in  Figure  11 ) or  at  constant  power  with  varying 
speeds  (shown  by  crosses).  Study  of  the  cutting  performed 
and  heat  produced  under  these  conditions  should  permit 
the  determination  of  the  effect  of  both  factors  upon 
cutting  efficiency.  Such  a program  has  been  undertaken 
in  the  expectation  that  it  will  eventually  lead  to  a 
better  understanding  of  the  dental  cutting  process  as 


a whole 


12 


III.  SUMMARY 

The  operating  characteristics  of  several  designs 
of  air  turbine  handpieces  have  been  investigated.  Their 
ability  to  transmit  energy  to  the  shaft  of  the  cutting 
instrument  was  studied  by  means  of  an  electro -dynamic 
brake,  and  was  found  to  be  strongly  dependent  upon  the 
dynamic  balance  of  the  instrument  and  upon  the  air 
pressure  used.  This  method  provides  a means  for  the 
comparison  of  various  air  turbine  handpieces  and  yields 
data  which  can  be  used  as  a basis  for  the  study  of  the 
mechanism  and  efficiency  of  dental  cutting  procedures. 


Bibliography 


1.  Peyton,  Floyd  A.,  Evaluation  of  Dental  Handpieces 

for  High  Speed  Operations.  J.A.D.A.  50;  383-391  * 

April  1955„ 

2.  Bernier,  J.  L.  and  Knapp,  M.  J„,  Methods  Used  in 
Evaluation  of  High  Speed  Dental  Instruments  and 
Some  Results.  Oral  Surg.,  Oral  Med.  and 

Oral  Path.  12;  234-252,  February  1959. 

3.  Rigas,  D.  J.,  Skinner,  E.  W.,  Lindenmeyer,  R.  S., 
and  Lasater,  R.  L.,  Design  Factors  of  Dental 
Burs  as  Related  to  Cutting  Effectiveness, 

J.  D.  Res.  37:  91  * February  1958,  Abstract. 

4.  Nelsen,  R.  J.,  Pelander,  C.  E.  and  Kumpula,  J.  W. , 
Hydraulic  Turbine  Com  tr3. -angle  Handpiece,  J.A.D.A., 
47:  324,  September  1953. 

5.  Hudson,  D.  C.,  and  Sweeney,  W.  T. , Temperatures 
Developed  in  Rotating  Dental  Cutting  Instruments, 
J.A.D  A.  48;  127,  February  1954. 

6.  Hudson,  D.  C.,  Hartley,  J.  L.,  Moore,  Robert  and 
Sweeney,  W„  T.,  Factors  influencing  the  Cutting 
Characteristics  of  Rotating  Dental  Instruments, 
J.A.D.A.  50:  377,  April  1955. 

7.  Dental  Burs  in  Action.  Film  available  on  loan  from 
the  Office  of  Scientific  Publications,  National 
Bureau  of  Standards,  Washington  25,  D.  C.,  or  the 
American  Dental  Association  Film  Library,  222 

East  Superior  St.,  Chicago  11,  Illinois. 

8.  Hartley,  J.  L.,  Hudson,  D.  C.,  Sweeney,  W.  T. , and 
Richardson,  W.  P.,  Cutting  Characteristics  of  Dental 
Burs.  Armed  Forces  Medical  J.  8;  209,  February  1957. 

9.  Hartley,  J.  L.,  Hudson,  D.  C.,  Sweeney,  W.  T. , and 
Dickson,  George.,  Methods  for  the  Evaluation  of 
Rotating  Diamond-abrasive  Dental  Instruments., 

J.  A.  D.  A.,  54:  637,  May  1957. 

10.  Perkins,  Robert  R.,  Taylor,  Duane  F.,  and  Kumpula, 

J.  W.,  Evaluation  of  Dental  Cutting  Procedure; 

Method  and  Apparatus  (in  preparation). 


Table  1 


Air  Turbine  Handpieces  Tested 


Handpiece 

Humber  of  Samples 

Densco 

Aero  Turbex 

1 

Midwest 

Air  Drive 

1 

Ritter 

Air  Rotor 

2 

S.S.  White 

Air  Rotor 

1 

Weber  * 

Air  Turbine 

700 

4 

Weber 

Air  Turbine 

AT  200 

2 

Table  2 


The  Effect  of  Balancing  Upon  Maximum  Rotational  Speed 


Magnet  Cylinder 


1 

2 

Initial  Speed 

80,000  rpm 

50,000  rpm 

1st  Grinding 

85,000 

75,000 

2nd  Grinding 

85,000 

280,000 

^rd  Grinding 

320,000 

-- 

3 

70.000  rpm 

220,000 

50.000 

210,000 


Handpiece 

Pressure 

Cylinder 


Weber  AT- 200  Air  Turbine 

30  psl 

.240  Diam.  x .400  length  approx. 


The  Effect  of  Air  Pressure  Upon  the  Rotational  Speed  of  Various  Instruments 


ft 

G 

01 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

O 

O 

ft 

O 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

O 

•\ 

•4 

•\ 

VO 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

co 

VO 

CM 

CM 

CO 

in 

o 

CM 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CM 

CM 

co 

£ 

°H 

ft 

01 

G 

ft 

O 

o 

O 

o 

O 

o 

o 

0 

O 

o 

O 

o 

O 

o 

o 

O 

O 

O 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

0 

m 

«\ 

•\ 

•\ 

•H 

o 

o 

o 

o 

in 

O 

o 

ft 

-=!■ 

■St 

o 

G\ 

D— 

n 

CM 

CO 

CO 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

c 

cti 

w 

£ 

O 

•H 

ft 

O 

0 

CO 

G 

si 

ft 

O 

o 

o 

O 

o 

O 

o 

• 

p 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

o 

XI 

o 

-=t 

•» 

•V 

•N 

n 

•\ 

-•V 

«\ 

P 

p 

o 

o 

o 

m 

o 

in 

m 

faD 

-=J" 

o 

CO 

in 

CM 

t— 

G 

0) 

CM 

CO 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

0 

G 

rH 

G 

so 

£ 

X 

CQ 

ft 

o 

CD 

G 

G 

G 

•H 

O 

o 

O 

O 

o 

O 

o 

•H 

o 

ft 

01 

O 

o 

O 

O 

o 

O 

o 

o 

ft 

O 

o 

O 

O 

o 

O 

o 

O 

CM 

G 

•N 

•V 

•\ 

1 

•H 

o 

o 

o 

m 

O 

in 

o 

o 

CM 

&H 

< 

on 

■=t 

G\ 

c- 

CO 

CM 

o 

in 

• 

<c 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

CM 

£ 

• 

G 

ft 

g* 

0 

G 

3 

P 

•H 

O 

O 

o 

O 

O 

O 

O 

■H 

0 

01 

O 

O 

o 

O 

O 

O 

O 

T3 

ft 

O 

O 

o 

O 

O 

O 

O 

•V 

•V 

•s 

•V 

O 

o 

o 

o 

o 

O 

o 

o 

CM 

co 

D — 

in 

CO 

O 

CO 

rH 

CM 

CM 

rH 

CM 

1 — 1 

CM 

0 

G 

O 

0 

0 

-d 

•H 

G 

ft 

•H 

rH 

G 

0 

i — 1 

CM 

CO 

o 

W 

• 

o 

© 

O 

o 

o 

G 

G 

P 

55 

55 

55 

2 

3 

G 

G 

ft 

G 

ft 

3 

Q) 

G 

G 

G 

3 

ft 

s 

0 

0 

0 

O 

« 

00 

3 

■o 

T) 

T) 

O 

in 

in 

g 

G 

G 

C 

t>- 

vo 

in 

co 

p 

•H 

•H 

•H 

01 

t — 1 

i — 1 

rH 

« 

0 

o 

• 

G 

>5 

>5 

O 

O 

O 

o 

H 

o 

O 

o 

55 

55 

55 

/ /-  s</0  0 


Figure  1. 


Apparatus  employed  for  the  high  speed - 
low  torque  measurements. 


* 

i 


SPEED  1000  rpm 


Figure  3.  Torque  - speed  curve  typical  of  air  turbine  handpieces e 


SPEED  iooo 


' 

\ 


\ 


Figure  5.  Torque  - speed  curve  showing  mild  resonance  effects. 


Figure  6.  Torque  - speed  curve  showing  extreme  resonance  effects. 


Figure  7 


I INCH 


View  showing  the  effect  of  grinding  for  dynamic  balancing 
upon  the  shape  of  magnet  cylinders. 


\ 


■ 


i 


400  - 


E 

Q. 

t_ 

o 

o 

o 

Q 

Ll) 

LU 

CL 

c n 


350 


300  - 


250 


200  - 


150  - 


100  - 


POWER-SPEED  CURVES 
AIR  TURBINE  HANDPIECES 


MIDWEST 

2 WEBER  A T 2 0 0 

3 SS  WHITE 

4 RITTER 

5 DENSCO 

6 WEBER  700 


POWER  watt  s 


Figure  9.  Power  - speed  curves  for  various  air  turbine  handpieces^ 
derived  from  the  data  of  Figure  8. 


Figure  10.  Torque  - speed  curvefj  showing  the  effect  of  variation  in  air 

pressure . 


SPEED  iooo 


Figure  11.  Power  - speed  curves  showing  the  effect  of  variation  in  air 
pressure . 


u.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OK  COMMERCE 

Lewis  lj.  Strauss,  Srrrflnty 


national  mmtcAu  OF  STANDARDS 
A.  V.  AaOiI,  Director 


THE  NATIONAL  RVJRKAI.T  OF  STANIIAltRIS 


WASHINGTON,  IP.  €. 


KloCtrldty  nml  Klortroillrs.  Resistance  and  Reactance.  Electron  Devices.  Electrical  In- 
struments. Magnetic  Measurements.  Dielectrics,.  Engineering  Electronics.  Electronic  Instru- 
mentation. Electrochemistry. 

Optics  and  Metrology.  Photometry  and  Colorimetry.  Optical  Instruments.  Photographic 
Technology.  Length.  Engineering  Metrology. 

Heat.  Temperature  Physics.  Thermodynamics.  Cryogenic  Physics.  Rheology.  Engine  Fuels. 
Free  Radicals  Research. 

Atomic  and  Radiation  PhysIctN.  Spectroscopy.  Rudiometry.  Mass  Spectrometry.  Solid 
State  Physics.  Electron  Physics.  Atomic  Physics.  Neutron  Physics.  Radiation  Theory. 
Radioactivity.  X-rays.  High  Energy  Radiation.  Nucleonic  Instrumentation.  Radiological 
Equipment.  ' 

Chemistry.  Organic  Coatings.  Surface  Chemistry.  Organic  Chemistry.  Analytical  Chemistry. 
Inorganic  Chemistry.  Electrodeposition.  Molecular  Structure  nnd  Properties  of  Gases.  Physical 
Chemistry.  Thermochemistry.  {Spectrochemistry.  Pure  Substances. 

Mechanics.  Sound.  Mechanical  Instruments,  Fluid  Mechanics.  Engineering  Mechanics.  Mass 
and  Scale.  Capacity,  Density,  nnd  Fluid  Meters.  Combustion  Controls. 

Organic  and  PiliroiiN  Materials.  Rubber.  Textiles.  Paper.  Leather.  Testing  and 
Specifications.  Polymer  Structure.  Plastics.  Dental  Research. 

Metallurgy.  Thermal  Metallurgy.  Chemical  Metallurgy.  Mechanical  Metallurgy.  Corrosion. 
Metal  Physics. 

Mineral  Products.  Engineering  Ceramics.  Glass.  Refractories,  Enameled  Metals.  Concreting 
Materials.  Constitution  and  Microstructure. 

Illllldiug  Technology.  Structural  Engineering.  Eire  Protection.  Air  Conditioning,  Heating, 
and  Refrigeration.  P’loor,  Roof,  nnd  Wall  Coverings.  Codes  and  Safety  Standards.  Heat  Transfer. 

Applied  Mathematics.  Numerical  Analysis.  Computation.  Statistical  Engineering.  Mathe- 
matical Physics. 

Data  Processing  Systems.  SEAC  Engineering  Croup.  Components  and  Techniques.  Digital 
Circuitry.  Digital  Systems.  Anolog  Systems.  Application  Engineering. 

• Office  of  Basic  Instrumentation.  * Office  of  Weights  and  Measures. 

IIOUMH1H,  COLOR  AGO 

Cryogenic  engineering.  Cryogenic  Equipment.  Cryogenic  Processes.  Properties  of  Mate- 
rials. Gas  Liquefaction. 

Radio  Propagation  PhyNicp.  Upper  Atmosphere  Research,  lonospherij  Research.  Regu- 
lar Propagation  Services.  Sun-Earth  Relationships.  VIII*'  Research.  Ionospheric  Communication 
Systems. 

lludio  Propagation  BtiigineorGng.  Data  Reduction  liistnimcntuliou.  Modulation  Systems. 
Navigation  Systems.  Radio  Noise.  I roposplicric  Measurements.  Tropospheric  Analysis,  Radio 
Systems  Application  Engineering.  Radio-Meteorology. 

Radio  StniulnnlN.  High  Frequency  Electrical  Standards.  Radio  Broadcast  Service.  High 
Frequency  Impedance  Standards,  Electronic  Calibration  Center.  Microwave  Physics,  Microwave 
Circuit  Standards.